Training & Fitness - Get stronger
Training power and explosiveness
Last updated 30 September 2026. How we write this .
Power training develops the ability to produce force quickly. Jumps, throws and fast lifting can improve explosive performance when movement quality, recovery and individual capacity guide practice.
Start here Power training develops the ability to produce force quickly. Jumps, throws and fast lifting can improve explosive performance when movement quality, recovery and individual capacity guide practice.
By the end, you will understand What power and explosiveness mean How the body produces force quickly What the evidence actually supports Key words used in this lesson Sequence The specific order of amino acids in a peptide. The sequence determines the shape the molecule takes and therefore what it can bind to, which is why changing one amino acid can change a compound entirely. Full plain-English glossary
Where this information comes from Claim-cited evidence. Central research claims on this lesson are linked to specific studies or official guidance.
This lesson links the specific studies and guidance used for its central claims.
Our standard: expert or athlete opinion may illustrate a viewpoint, but it is never treated as proof. Read the editorial policy .
Report an error or outdated claim .
Training power and explosiveness develops the ability to produce useful force quickly through movements such as jumps, throws and fast lifting variations. General strength supports this ability, but expressing strength at speed also requires specific practice. The aim is high-quality movement, so repetitions should usually stop when speed or landing quality clearly falls.
What power and explosiveness mean
Mechanical power describes how quickly work is done. In a moving object, it depends on both force and velocity: moving a substantial resistance quickly requires more power than moving the same resistance slowly. Strength concerns force capacity, whereas power concerns how that force contributes to movement over time.
Explosiveness is a broader coaching term, often referring to how rapidly force rises after a movement begins. Researchers call this rate of force development. It matters when there is little time to push, such as during a sprint foot contact. It overlaps with power, but the two are not identical: force can rise rapidly before much movement occurs.
The lesson Strength vs hypertrophy: what changes? explores force capacity and muscle growth. Here, the additional question is whether someone can express their available capacity within the time a task allows. A stronger person is not automatically the faster jumper or thrower.
How the body produces force quickly
The nervous system activates muscle through motor units, each consisting of a nerve cell and the muscle fibres it controls. Explosive efforts depend partly on recruiting these units promptly and sending rapid signals. Coordination also matters: well-timed contributions from the hips, trunk and limbs can transfer force more effectively than strong muscles working out of sequence.
Muscle has a force-velocity relationship. During shortening, its capacity to produce force generally decreases as shortening speed increases. Very heavy resistance therefore moves slowly, while very light resistance permits speed but demands less force. Peak power often occurs between these extremes, although the best loading conditions depend on the exercise and person.
Jumps also involve the stretch-shortening cycle: an active muscle-tendon system lengthens before shortening. Tendons can store and return elastic energy, while muscle activation and the timing of the movement influence the result. This is why a jump with a preparatory dip differs from one beginning in a held position. A deeper or faster dip is not automatically better.
What the evidence actually supports
Controlled training studies support improvements in jump performance from plyometric training, which uses rapid transitions between absorbing and producing force. Sprint and change-of-direction performance can also improve, but transfer varies with the exercises, participants and tests. Confidence is stronger for improving a practised performance measure than for becoming universally more athletic.
Much of this research involves relatively small groups, short programmes and healthy participants. Differences in training experience, supervision and comparison groups make it difficult to identify one superior method. Reviews can combine studies, but combining several small trials does not remove weaknesses in their design or make their findings apply to everyone.
In older adults, randomised trials and systematic reviews indicate that resistance exercise performed with an intention to move quickly can improve measured muscle power. Evidence about whether it improves everyday physical function more than conventional strength training is mixed. A better laboratory power score does not establish fewer falls, longer independence or greater longevity.
Mechanistic research helps explain adaptations in neural activation and muscle-tendon behaviour. However, a plausible explanation is not proof of a particular programme's effectiveness. Claims about injury prevention or long-term health need studies measuring those outcomes, rather than assumptions based on faster movement alone.
Build the base, then practise the task
General strength provides useful capacity, but there is no universal strength threshold that everyone must reach before practising simple power movements. Beginners benefit from learning the basic movement, landing and deceleration before adding load, speed or complexity. The appropriate starting point depends on balance, movement experience and tolerance of impact.
Landing and deceleration involve absorbing momentum through coordinated muscle action and joint movement. Their demands increase with approach speed, jump height and external load. Being able to leave the ground does not establish readiness to absorb a harder landing, and a quiet landing alone does not prove that forces are well managed.
Jumps emphasise accelerating the body and managing the landing. Direction and whether the task uses one or both legs affect its demands. Throws allow acceleration through release, but require a suitable space and control of the whole movement. Fast lifting variations develop force at speed against resistance. Technical complexity differs greatly between exercises. Rapid movements without leaving the ground can develop aspects of power with different impact demands from jumping. Explosive describes the intention and timing of force production, not a requirement for uncontrolled movement. The lifting or pushing phase can be fast while the return, landing or reset remains deliberate.
Why quality and recovery matter
Power practice depends on producing repeated efforts with enough freshness to preserve the intended speed and coordination. Fatigue can reduce force, slow movement and alter how a person lands. Continuing until exhaustion may create a demanding workout, but the later repetitions increasingly practise something different from fresh explosive performance.
This explains the usual emphasis on stopping when speed, jump height, throw distance or landing control clearly deteriorates. No single stopping threshold suits every exercise or participant. Coaches may use observation or measurement, but the judgement should reflect the task rather than an arbitrary target number of repetitions.
Rest between efforts allows the systems supporting rapid energy supply and force production to recover. Breathlessness is a poor guide to this process: someone may feel ready while movement speed remains reduced. Similarly, soreness and sweating do not establish that a useful power stimulus occurred.
Common misunderstandings
Moving a heavy load with maximum intent can train rapid force production even when its actual speed is low. However, intent does not make every heavy repetition equivalent to a fast jump or throw. Different tasks expose the body to different speeds, coordination demands and opportunities to apply force.
A higher box does not necessarily indicate a more powerful jump. Someone can land on a taller box by pulling their knees higher without raising their centre of mass much further. Performance comparisons need consistent technique and a measurement that actually represents the intended ability.
More elaborate exercises are not inherently more effective. Complexity can shift attention towards learning the movement rather than producing force effectively. Equally, power is task-specific: improving a vertical jump does not guarantee a stronger tennis serve or quicker response to an unexpected loss of balance.
Who it applies to and where caution matters
Power training is relevant to athletes, recreational exercisers and older adults whose goals involve moving forcefully within limited time. Its form can differ substantially between these groups. Age alone does not determine suitability, but evidence from supervised, independent older adults cannot automatically be extended to people with substantial frailty.
People with current injury, recent surgery, significant balance difficulties or a health condition affecting exercise need individually appropriate guidance. Pregnancy and the period after birth can also change the suitability of impact-based movements. Findings from healthy sport participants provide limited guidance for these circumstances.
Stop activity for chest pain, faintness, unusual breathlessness, new neurological symptoms or significant or worsening pain. Call 999 for fainting during exercise, severe breathing difficulty, sudden chest pain that does not go away, or sudden difficulty speaking or moving. Contact NHS 111 for unusual breathing difficulty without emergency features, and a GP for recurring chest discomfort or persistent pain.
How to judge progress and claims
Useful progress measures match the goal: jump height, throw distance or movement speed under consistent conditions. Technique, equipment, warm-up and fatigue can all change a result. Improvement across repeated comparable assessments is more convincing than a single personal best, especially when someone is still learning the test.
For a training claim, ask who was studied, what they actually did, what comparison was used and which outcome improved. Look for controlled human studies and agreement across research, while recognising uncertainty about the best method. A persuasive claim connects a specific exercise to a measured benefit without turning a short-term performance gain into a promise about health or longevity.
This lesson is general education, not an individual training, nutrition or medical prescription. Adapt activity to your experience and health, and seek qualified advice for symptoms, injury, pregnancy or a medical condition.
Related in this classroom The studies behind this page American College of Sports Medicine position stand: progression models in resistance training for healthy adults - Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2002Sources for this classroom
Educational content only. Not medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before changing your health regimen.